- 相關(guān)推薦
柏拉圖與陸機(jī)的“靈感論”比較 - 畢業(yè)論文
摘 要
靈感作為文藝創(chuàng)作中1種心理現(xiàn)象,很早就為中西文藝?yán)碚摷宜P(guān)注并加以研究。靈感理論的發(fā)現(xiàn)與提出,對(duì)于文學(xué)創(chuàng)作,是大為有用的。本文將中國晉朝陸機(jī)的“靈感”論與西方著名文藝?yán)碚摷野乩瓐D的“靈感”論置于同1平臺(tái)進(jìn)行跨文化比較研究。論文首先對(duì)柏拉圖與陸機(jī)的“靈感”論進(jìn)行分別論述,然后在此基礎(chǔ)上分別找出他們的相同之處和不同之處。相同之處表現(xiàn)在2者都是文學(xué)創(chuàng)作語境中的1種客觀現(xiàn)象,并且具有相同的內(nèi)涵,即都是1種無意識(shí)的心里現(xiàn)象;不同之處表現(xiàn)在他們對(duì)靈感來源的解釋不1樣,柏拉圖認(rèn)為靈感是“神賜”的、不可知的,而陸機(jī)則從唯物的立場(chǎng)來探求“靈感”之源;2者靈感論的外延也不相同。雖然2者的靈感論都是作為文藝?yán)碚撎岢鰜淼,但柏拉圖靈感論的外延要大得多。
關(guān)鍵詞:柏拉圖;陸機(jī);靈感論;比較
ABSTRACT
Inspiration as a psychological phenomenon of literary and artistic creation was concerned and studied for the China and the West theorist at a long time ago. The discovery and propose of inspiration theory for the literary creations are much useful. This article put the Chinese JinChao LuJi`s "inspiration" with western renowned literary arts theoretician Plato`s " inspiration" on the same platform for cross-cultural comparative studies. First, the article Exposited Plato and LuJi`s "inspiration" theory respectively, and then on that basis to identify the points of convergence and divergence between them. The same point performances are in the literary creations speaking context an objective phenomenon, and have the same connotation that is a violation of the psychological phenomena; The differences in their theory was that their explain of the sources of inspiration are different, Plato believes that inspiration "from God alone", unknown, but LuJi from the position to explore materialism "inspiration" sources; The two inspirations` outreach are difference. Although both inspiration theory are presented as a literary and art theory, but the theory of Plato inspiration to be more extensive.
Key words: Plato; LuJi; inspiration; Compare
【柏拉圖與陸機(jī)的“靈感論”比較 - 畢業(yè)論文】相關(guān)文章:
老子道論與柏拉圖理念論之比較04-29
柏拉圖、黑格爾靈感論與文學(xué)翻譯中靈感現(xiàn)象淺析04-29
柏拉圖的正義論05-02
解讀柏拉圖理念論04-27
老子與柏拉圖的王思想比較05-02
論靈感思維04-27
論比較04-29
程朱理學(xué)與陸王心學(xué)道德修養(yǎng)論比較04-29
孔子與柏拉圖人治思想之比較04-30
孟子與柏拉圖倫理政治觀比較04-29